Series: GNTECH Infrastructure Deployment Series · Part 01 of 12 · Next: Part 02 — Hetzner Proxmox Foundation (planned)

A hybrid homelab is easy to start and difficult to keep safe: a hypervisor needs management access, a virtual router needs a WAN path, applications need DNS and identity, and backups need to remain usable when the primary site fails. Before running any installer, decide which component owns each route, address, trust boundary, and recovery mechanism.

This guide presents a generic, reproducible architecture inspired by GNTECH’s design goals, not an export of its production configuration. All networks and identities below are examples. No live infrastructure was changed or validated for this article.

Conceptual home and Hetzner hybrid architecture

1. Define the outcome

Our target has two physical locations:

  • Home site: a Proxmox node, MikroTik edge router, VLAN-aware switch, user devices, and optional backup storage.
  • Hetzner site: a Proxmox node, provider WAN, two independent MikroTik CHR transit networks, and a separate general-purpose VM LAN.
  • Shared services: directory/identity, authenticated remote administration, monitoring, and a backup-and-restore process.

A virtual router is not an alternative recovery path for its own hypervisor. The host must retain a management and rescue method that works even if every CHR VM is powered off.

2. Inventory before allocating IPs

Create a small source-of-truth table. For each host or router record: owner, physical site, operating system, management interface, storage, power dependencies, DNS name, recovery method, and backup target. Do not publish real management IPs, serial numbers, public addresses, or secrets.

Role Example name Recovery dependency
Home hypervisor HOME-PVE Local console or independent management
Hetzner hypervisor DC-PVE Hetzner console/rescue access
Home edge router HOME-RTR Local access and saved RouterOS export
Hosted virtual routers CHR-A / CHR-B DC-PVE console and disk backup
Directory / DNS ID-01 Independent administrative credentials
Backup service BACKUP-01 Restore keys and off-site copy
Monitoring OBS-01 Alerts to a destination outside the failed site

3. Plan distinct network zones

Documentation-only examples: RFC 1918 private subnets and RFC 5737 public ranges are used to explain relationships. They are not copied from an actual GNTECH deployment.

Zone Example CIDR Boundary
Home users 10.10.10.0/24 Internet and explicitly approved services
Home servers 10.10.20.0/24 Restricted inbound from users
Home IoT 10.10.40.0/24 No default access to management
Home management 10.10.99.0/24 Admin-only access
Hetzner CHR-A transit 10.255.1.0/30 Host ↔ CHR-A only
Hetzner CHR-B transit 10.255.2.0/30 Host ↔ CHR-B only
Hetzner VM LAN 10.3.0.0/24 Host-gated outbound access
CHR-A workload LAN 10.11.0.0/24 CHR-A-owned routing policy
CHR-B workload LAN 10.12.0.0/24 CHR-B-owned routing policy

Keep the CHR workload LANs on different internal bridges. A transit bridge is not a general-purpose VM switch. Avoid overlapping CIDRs across sites if you intend to route them over a VPN.

Address ownership and public routing

In the routed-CHR pattern, the Hetzner host retains its provider-configured WAN interface. Each CHR has a /30 point-to-point transit connection. Provider-routed additional public IPv4 addresses can be directed via host /32 routes to the relevant CHR peer, only when the provider confirms that routing model for the purchased IP allocation.

Do not assume that a Hetzner additional IP, subnet, virtual MAC, or IPv6 prefix is interchangeable. The exact provider requirements belong in Part 02 and Part 03, after checking the current product documentation.

4. Map the control plane separately from data traffic

Plane Example traffic Protection
Management Admin → Proxmox API/SSH, RouterOS, VM consoles MFA, narrowly scoped identity, private access, independent rescue
Data Clients → apps, app → database, routed inter-site traffic Zone policies, least privilege, explicit egress
Identity Clients/services → DNS, AD DS, Entra integrations Resilient DNS, time sync, separate break-glass credentials
Backup Hypervisors/guests → backup target Restricted write access, immutable/offline copy where feasible, restore testing
Telemetry Exporters/logs → collectors → alerts Read-only exporters, limited retention and credentials

Cloudflare Tunnel and Zero Trust can protect selected administrative paths, but should not be the only way to regain control of a broken router or hypervisor. An identity outage must not prevent emergency recovery.

5. Build a dependency order

  1. Recovery first: confirm provider rescue, local console, and configuration backups.
  2. Foundation: install the hypervisor, storage, host WAN, and time synchronization.
  3. Network: add isolated bridges, transit routing, firewall, and test VMs.
  4. Identity: deploy DNS and directory services with a break-glass path.
  5. Secure access: add tunnels, SSO, MFA, and device restrictions.
  6. Applications: deploy reverse proxy and containers only after segmentation works.
  7. Resilience: configure backup targets, off-site copies, and restore tests.
  8. Observability: instrument every critical dependency and test alert delivery.

Do not deploy the monitoring system as the sole proof that the monitoring system is healthy. Include external checks where feasible.

6. Write a threat and failure model

Scenario Design response Test
CHR-A stops Host console remains accessible Power off CHR-A in maintenance and reach DC-PVE via recovery channel
Wrong firewall rule Safe rollback from independent console Apply a temporary deny in a test zone and restore
Tunnel or identity outage Break-glass management path Simulate unavailable tunnel in a controlled window
Home ↔ Hetzner VPN fails No accidental routing or DNS leak Disable tunnel and inspect routes and policy
Backup target unavailable Workloads continue; alert fires Disconnect test target, verify alert and retry
Hypervisor storage loss Recover from separate copy Restore disposable VM to isolated host/storage

The table is a future acceptance test plan, not evidence that those tests have passed.

7. Record your design in a repository

A small text-first design repository is enough to begin. This is a local, non-destructive scaffold; it creates files in a new directory and does not configure any infrastructure:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
mkdir -p gntech-lab-design/{inventory,network,runbooks,validation}
cat > gntech-lab-design/README.md <<'EOF'
# Hybrid infrastructure design
Status: proposed; not deployed
Rules:
- No secrets or real public IP addresses in Git
- One owner per subnet, route, and firewall boundary
- Record recovery steps before changing remote management
- Track validation separately from intended architecture
EOF
cat > gntech-lab-design/network/zones.csv <<'EOF'
zone,cidr,site,owner,default_policy
home-users,10.10.10.0/24,home,HOME-RTR,restricted
home-management,10.10.99.0/24,home,HOME-RTR,deny-untrusted
chr-a-transit,10.255.1.0/30,hetzner,DC-PVE,point-to-point
chr-b-transit,10.255.2.0/30,hetzner,DC-PVE,point-to-point
vm-lan,10.3.0.0/24,hetzner,DC-PVE,restricted
EOF
cat > gntech-lab-design/validation/acceptance.md <<'EOF'
# Acceptance checks
- [ ] Host management works with both CHRs stopped
- [ ] No unapproved traffic between workload LANs
- [ ] Provider-routed addresses use intended routers
- [ ] A VM can be restored to an isolated destination
- [ ] Monitoring alerts reach an external destination
EOF

Inspect the result:

1
2
find gntech-lab-design -type f -print
cat gntech-lab-design/network/zones.csv

This scaffold does not include real credentials, network configurations, or public addresses. Replace sample subnets only after checking that they do not conflict with existing site networks.

8. Architecture review checklist

Before Part 02, you should be able to answer:

  • Which route owns each subnet and public IP?
  • Which systems can access hypervisor management ports?
  • What works when both CHRs are down?
  • How do you reach Hetzner rescue without relying on the VPN?
  • Which DNS and identity components must start first?
  • Which backup copy survives losing either site?
  • Which test proves that an unauthorized zone cannot reach another zone?

If an answer is missing, fix the diagram and inventory before configuring live routing.

Next in the series

Part 02 — Hetzner Proxmox Foundation will cover installation choices, storage, WAN configuration, safe remote administration, and recovery checkpoints. For an existing practical router example, see the dual-CHR Hetzner tutorial.

References